Immigration “compromise” sells out our sovereignty
Posted by Bret WeaverMay 31st, 2007
Presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-TX) issued a statement yesterday on the immigration bill currently being debated in the Senate. Anyone paying attention to the debates has probably noticed that Ron doesn’t sound much like the other Republican candidates…
I have reprinted the statement below, in it’s entirety.
You can see the original posting here.
The much-vaunted Senate “compromise” on immigration is a compromise alright: a compromise of our laws, a compromise of our sovereignty, and a compromise of the Second Amendment. That anyone in Washington believes this is a credible approach to solving our immigration crisis suggests just how out of touch our political elites really are.
The reality is that this bill will grant amnesty to virtually all of the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in the country today. Supporters use very creative language to try and convince us that amnesty is not really amnesty, but when individuals who have entered the United States illegally are granted citizenship – regardless of the fees they are charged – what you have is amnesty.
What is seldom discussed in the immigration debate, unfortunately, is the incentives the US government provides for people to enter the United States illegally. As we know well, when the government subsidizes something we get more of it. The government provides a myriad of federal welfare benefits to those who come to the US illegally, including food stamps and free medical care. Is this a way to discourage people from coming to the US illegally?



OK, so maybe Khaled Hosseini's "A Thousand Splendid Suns" didn't make the same kind of emotional connection as his magnificent first novel "The Kite Runner." After all, the "Suns" story was about the lives and friendship of two women in wartime Kabul, overlaid with the politics that have made that city and that part of the world nearly unbearable, compared to the autobiographical-sounding tale from the earlier novel. (Click 